The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2852DOCUMENT CONVERSION SERVICES PROVIDED BY IMAGING & MICROFILM ACCESS, INC. www.scanyourdocs.com 631- 589 -8100 62.10 -2 -5 BOX 24 02852 1!146 C . - r ,� I, • - it 02852 Printer Friendly Report - Image Mate Online Pagel of 2 �P Oe1'fy �Pqui itiQn,tip-P?? _.(-d -F .1,;.:'� ^ "� U Municipality of Putnam Valley, Town of Area Living Area: 941 sq. ft. Status: Active Second Story Area: 0 sq. ft. Roll Section: Taxable -.. Additinp--0 Sti►ry - reap - ^ sq. ft. Swis: 372800 Finished Basement: 0 sq. ft. Tax Map ID #: , ;62:10 -2 -5 NO Photo Property Class: 260 - Seasonal res Available Site: RES 1 In Ag. District: No Site Property Class: 260 - Seasonal res Zoning Code: R3 Neighborhood Code: 28010. Total Acreage /Size: 0.40 School District: Putnam Valley Land Assessment: 2012 - $74,400 Total Assessment: 2012 - $275,500 Full Market Value: 2012 - $281,100 Market Value /sgft: 2012-$299 Equalization Rate: 2012 - 100.00% Legal Property Desc: 03900000020010000000 000200000152000000000 39 -2 -1 Deed Book: 1464 Deed Page: 315 Grid East: 671694 Grid North: 933162 Area Living Area: 941 sq. ft. First Story Area: 941 sq. ft. Second Story Area: 0 sq. ft. Half Story Area: 0 sa, ft. -.. Additinp--0 Sti►ry - reap - ^ sq. ft. 314 Siury Area. ft. Finished Basement: 0 sq. ft. Number of Stories: i Structure Building Style: Old style Bedrooms: 2 Fireplaces: 1 Porch Type: Porch- enclsd Basement Garage Cap: 0 Overall Condition: Normal Year Built: 1937 Owners Bathrooms (Full - Half): 1 - 0 Kitchens: 1 Basement Type: Slab /pier Porch Area: 168.00 Attached Garage Cap: 0.00 sq. ft. Overall Grade: Average Dennis Werthner, Sr Marion Geraghty 4 Cross Rd 4 Cross Rd Putnam Valley NY 10579 Putnam Valley NY 10579 http: / /putnam. sdgnys.comlreport.aspx ?file= &swiscode= 372800 &printkey = 062010000200... 7/10/2013 Printer Friendly Report - Image Mate Online A Page 2 of 2 Sales s Sale Date Price 3/19/1999 $0 5/27/1997 $1 Property Class 210-1 Family Res 210-1 Family Res Sale Type Land & Building Land & Building Prior Value Owner Usable Ruddy, No James Wethner D Ruddy, No James Arms Length No No Addl. Parcels No Yes Deed Book and Page 1464/315 1393/18 Utilities Sewer Type: Private Water Supply: Private Utilities: Electric Heat Type: No central Fuel Type: None Central Air: No http : / /putnam.sdgnys.comlreport.aspx ?file= &swiscode= 372800 &printkey = 062010000200... 7/10/2013 JOHN H. LANDI Code Enforcement Officer Zoning and Fire Inspector jlandi @putnamvalley.com PATRICIA A. SMITH Deputy Zoning Inspector psmith@pubiamvalley.com DOREEN C. PIACENTE Clerk to the Building Dept dpiacente@putnatuvalley.com TOWN OF PUTNAM VALLEY BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT October 5, 2012 Mr. Joseph Paravati Putnam County Health Department 1- Geneva Road Brewster, NY 10509 Town Hall 265 Oscawana Lake Road Putnam Valley, NX 10579 (845) 526 -2377 (845) 526 -8806 (fax) Re: 133 Lake Front Road Putnam Valley TM #62.10 -2 -5 - 7. Dear Mr. Paravati: Attached please find copy of e-mail from Mr. Geraghty to Mr. Zutt which should have been an attachment to the letter dated October 3, 2012 addressed to you, which was inadvertently not enclosed. This e-mail was referenced in the letter. If you have any questions, please contact the building department. Very truly yours, a JOHN H. LANDI Code Enforcement Officer JHL /dcp r 9 Doreen Piacente From: BHZLAW @aol.com Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2012 4:03 PM To: Doreen Piacente Subject: Fwd: Easement on 133 Lake Front Rd. Attachments: LetterfromWilliamZutt 8- 5- 11.pdf Doreen- Here's the email that was sent to me by Mr. Geraghty on 8/3/12, which should have been included in John's letter to Mr. Paravati. -Bill From: kggeraghty@gmail.com To: bhzlaw @aol.com Sent: 8/3/201211:01:13 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time Subj: Easement on 133 Lake Front Rd. Mr. Zutt, one year ago you sent me the attached letter about the town's position on releasing the easement on my property. I have spoken with an engineer at the Putnam County Dept. of Health and he advises me that my property is a pre- existing, non - conforming use and cannot be brought up to a code that 1 a did not exist at the time it was constructed. Septic system codes enacted subsequent to ,. _.: .: 1_p:'r7 f�^ r"1_• �: �: : �„ �;:f•• J�; ai. i` a�.• .i�'.Y��r�'.%;..;•�•:C;i�.�.•� _�ii�_ 4 ..> - the. Dept. of. Health will not be able to approve a septic system for year round occupancy because this property already has the right to year round occupancy. The restriction in the Easement Agreement cannot be satisfied and the town does not have the right to impose such a land use restriction on my property. I again request that the town release the easement without my having to satisfy Section 5. Ken Geraghty 603 -532 -5951 4 JOHN FL LANDI Code Enforcement Officer Zoning and Fire Inspector jlandi @putnamvalley.com PATRICIA. A. SN= Deputy Zoning Inspector psmith @putnamvalley.com DOREEN C. PIACENTE Clerk to the Building Dept. dpiacente@putnamvalley.com TOWN OF PUTNAM VALLEY BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mr. Joseph Paravati Putnam County Health Department 1 Geneva Road Brewster, New York 10509 Re: 139 Lake Front Road Putnam Valley Tax Map 62.10 -2 -5 Dear Mr. Paravati: October 3, 2012 Town Hall 265 Oscawana Lake Road Putnam Valley, MY 10579 (845) 526 -2377 (845) 526 -8806 (fax) The above property was once serviced by a seasonal water system owned and operated by the Wildwood Knolls Improvement District. Due to deterioration of the District's _ infrastructure -and _excessi - P.nrtero ional Ccsts, t'he systenn -,,,as abandoned and discontinued;. ":. - Those whose sole water source was the seasonal system were therefore required to install wells. The above property was among those so affected. According to a Deed Restriction filed with the Putnam County Clerk in July, 1997, your Department referred the owner's well permit application to the Putnam Valley Town Building Inspector for comment. The Inspector, according to the document, recommended that no well permit issue until a septic system "adequate for year round use" was installed (the property is surrounded on 3 sides by Lake Oscawana, is barely % acre in size and, as shown later, is prone to flooding). As an accommodation to the former Owner, the Inspector withdrew his objection to the well permit provided the Owners filed a deed declaration restricting use of the property to the seasonal period formerly serviced by the decommissioned water district. The July, 1997 Deed Restriction (titled "Easement ") does precisely that, adding that the restriction will end "Upon. installation of a sewage disposal system adequate for year -round use, in accordance with plans approved by the Putnam County Department of Health ". A copy of the Deed Declaration is enclosed. _.Z ^Last year Mr. Kenneth Geraghty, writing in behalf of his mother Marion Geraghty, (a co- owner of the property), asked the Town to release the seasonal- occupancy restriction. Acknowledging that the property's limited size and location prohibited a "board of health compliant system ", Mr. Geraghty nevertheless maintained that the seasonal occupancy restriction was "unreasonable" and that his mother agreed to the restriction "under duress ". A copy of Mr. Geraghty's May 13, 2011 letter to our Town Attorney is enclosed. Mr. Geraghty's May 13, 2011 letter was circulated to the Putnam Valley Town Board, the Town Engineer, and myself for review and comment: It was our unanimous view that the seasonal occupancy restriction was appropriately imposed, and that it should remain undisturbed until the condition for its release is met. Mr. Geraghty was so informed in an August 5, 2011 letter from the Town Attorney, which noted that since the restriction was filed in 1997 the State had designated Lake Oscawana as a 303 -d impaired waterbody. Mr. Geraghty was advised to consult an engineer with a view toward exploring alternate septic technologies. Nothing further was heard from Mr. Geraghty until last week when, in an email to the Town Attorney, Mr. Geraghty reported a conversation with an unnamed "engineer at the Putnam County Health Department." According to Mr. Geraghty the engineer stated that "Septic System codes enacted subsequent to 1930 do not apply to this property", and that "... the Department of Health will not be able to approve a septic system for year round occupancy hecause the property_ already has the right to year round- occupancy". A copy of Mr. Geraghty's email is attached. Mr. Geraghty added that the Town did not have the "right" to impose the seasonal occupancy restriction, despite the site's acknowledged inability to support a septic system adequate for year -round occupancy. He again requested release of the restriction. Following receipt of Mr. Geraghty's latest email we reviewed the Town Assessor's file and found an assessment reduction petition signed and filed by Mr. Geraghty on May 25, 2004. The Petition, along with an "Addendum" signed by Mr. Geraghty, states: "4... The septic system does not meet code and the property floods in the spring" Addendum 2. The Town Building Inspector has determined that the sewage disposal system is not adequate for year -round use ... f' :A.no:tinr, of.-the. in thc- spriryL�,lim� ar�� %ramLiprc�.tha.nri�i�to.�cracc road to the house impassable... 4 ... The appraiser [who had appraised the property at a higher value than that petitioned —for by Mr. Geraghty] ... was unaware of the seasonal flooding, sewage disposal . problems and water restriction. 5. It is estimated to cost about $10,000 to bring add [sic] sufficient landfill to cure the flooding and install a modern sewage disposal system" The Assessment Reduction petition, based on the above submission, was granted.* By Mr. Geraghty's own admission, the site simply cannot support year -round occupancy . unless the septic system is appropriately upgraded. The very same health and safety considerations which resulted in the occupancy restriction 15 years ago remain unchanged and, if anything, have now been fortified by Lake Oscawanas' 303 -d "impaired waterbody" designation. While the authority to release the Seasonal Occupancy restriction rests solely with the Town, the tenor of Mr. Geraghty's email suggest that your Department might (or does) support its elimination. Would you please inform us as to your Departments' position in this matter? Thank you very much. Cc: Town Board Town Engineer Town Attorney Mr. Kenneth Geraghty *A copy of the Petition and its Addendum are enclosed. .✓ F $.S 4G�y[T• ATT __ . -.a. ..� -. ... . . • .. .� . � .. •. .ra. >»... a... s � .. .. �Y,c'A._. n.w r. .v au..Yo . _ .s. a.>• a. .,v .. . t ..i �y .. THIS GRANT OF EASEMENT, made the Dorothy B. Werthner residing at and James P. Ruddy residing at th day of July, 1997 BETWEEN (oo Putnam Valley, New York 10579, �6.1y,rr2i� �,y 11705 and the Estate of Arthur J. Gera �hyt�y, , Marion A. Geraghty, Executor, residing at j97) -Jr0 ,Q: &- I'G't�, 3 -7% ( the Property Owners) , AND THE TOWN OF PUTNAM VALLEY (the Town), Oscawana Lake Road, Putnam Valley, New York, a municipal corporation W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS the existing Wildwood Knolls Improvement District seasonal water supply system has, because of deterioration of its pipes, become unreliable and very costly to operate, and it is therefore the intent of the Town to discontinue its operation once all users dependent on this system as their sole source of supply have arranged for an alternate source, and WHEREAS the Property Owners have applied to the Putnam County Department of Health for a permit to construct an water well on their property in Section 62.10, Block 2, Lot 5 (Tax Map Number 62.10 -2 -5), the Department having referred this application for comment by the Town Building Inspector, who suggested that an approved sewage disposal system adequate for year -round use by -.. occupants :af ._saa d. _hQUSe bP: ..nctal ed. _prior ..to_...issuance - -ef a1ho . wok i _ .. _.. � -._, Aerial L, and WHEREAS the Property Owners are not currently in position to install an approved sewage disposal system adequate for year round use, within the time frame needed to arrange for their own well as a supply source for the summer season this year, and WHEREAS the Town Building Inspector is willing to withdraw his objection to the issuance of a well permit for these properties provided that the Property Owners grant an appropriate perpetual easement to the Town, in the form required. for the filing of a deed, allowing the Town to restrict operation of said well to the seasonal period between April 15 and Election Day each year until such time as the Property Owners install an approved sewage disposal system adequate for year round use. NOW THEREFORE the Property Owners and the Town agree as follows: 1. The Property Owners hereby agree to hay.q operation of the well restricted to the period between April 15 and Election Day each year ( the same as the seasonal service provided in the past by i BKI391PGO122 `ristaYl an approved sewage disposal system adequate for year - round use. To provide a means of restricting operation to the above period, the Property owners agree to provide a Lockable Switch at an accessable location on the electrical power line to the well. 2. The Property Owners do hereby grant a perpetual easement to the Town to enter and reenter upon their above property for the purpose of giving full force and effect to the agreed -to restriction of well operation to the period between April 15 and Election Day, including, at the Town's option, installing a padlock on the Lockable Switch. 3. The Property' Owners also agree to notify the Town when they receive approval from the Putnam County Department of Health for a permit to construct a sewage disposal system adequate for year -round use, and to provide the Town the opportunity to inspect the system during its installation to assure that it complies with the approved system plans. 4. The Town hereby agrees not to install its padlock on the Lockable switch earlier than Election Day each year and further agrees to remove said lock no later than April 15 of each following year. 5. The Town also agrees that upon installation of a sewage disposal system adequate for year round use, in accordance with plans approved by the Putnam County Department of Health, the Town will provide the Property Owners, or their heirs and assigns a document indicating the Town's agreement to vacate this easement. IN_.fniITNESS. WHE_- E-QF-, tnP :pa-rties , �ab'e- -set the) r, hands ..a:nd -:tire �aay and gear `ndcateat NaD�ovea ' ' .�_ ... _ ..._ GRANTORS: l.( J Dorothy Werthner mes P. Ruddy (? , CT2� CL CAL-A-U Harion A. Geraghty asg Exe6utor for the Estate of Arthur J. Geraghty GRANTEE, The Town of Putnam Valley Bye Carmelo Sa s, Supervisor 6 f BKI397PGO123 STATE OF-NEW YORK COUNTY OF ) On the 15' day of July, 1997, before me came DOROTHY B. WERTHNER to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and who acknowledged that she executed the same. otary Public VICTOR FUHR'MAW Notary Public. State of New Yolk .No. 0VFU5065821 Qualified in Queens County Comm' ^n F• , °res Sept. 1 :6, 19.21 STATE OF NEW YORK ) SS: COUNTY 'OF ) On the day of July, 1997, before me came JAMES P. RUDDY to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and who acknowledged that he executed the same. Kotary Public VICTOR .FUHR!MAN Notary Public, State of New York .No. 01'FU5065821 Qualified in OLteens County Commission Expires Sept. 16, 19,r r e 'r 1� 1391PGO 124 FW XC)Ri;�_ /�� 2-� ��S ) SS: A COUNTY OF ) STATE OF NEW YORK SS: COUNTY On the J, day of h�. 1997, before me came CARMELO SANTOS to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and who acknowledged that he executed the same. Notar Public PHYLLIS HUNT BOURGES Notary Publio, State of New York No. 4798459 Qualified In Putnam County Certifioate Filed In Ner�York� Commleslon Expires .21 "' On the Aq day of July, 1997, before me came MARION A. GERAGHTY to me known to the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and who acknowledged that she executed the same. Notary Public VANESSA R. PEW Notary Pubk, State of New York No. 01PE5071115 Qualified in Queen , != ommission Expire $ s r---1 2 STATE OF NEW YORK SS: COUNTY On the J, day of h�. 1997, before me came CARMELO SANTOS to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and who acknowledged that he executed the same. Notar Public PHYLLIS HUNT BOURGES Notary Publio, State of New York No. 4798459 Qualified In Putnam County Certifioate Filed In Ner�York� Commleslon Expires .21 +4 NYS BOARD OF REAL PROPERTY SERVICES RP -524 (10/02) 7, t./N I", tii "ii`�i i ti.7.�S .ii:la:. ;'. �.�• - BEFORE THE BOARD OF ASSESSMENT REVIEW FOR Putnam Valley (city, town village or county) PART ONE: GENERAL INFORMATION (General infonnation and instructions for completing this form are contained inform RP- 524 -Ins) 1. Name and telephone no. of owner(s) Geraghty, Kenneth G. Day no. Q01) 469 -2772 Evening no. X011 656 -0237 2. Mailing Address of owner(s) P.O. Box 3524 Hoboken, NJ 07030. . 3. Name, address and telephone no. of representative of owner, if representative is filing application. (if applicable, complete Part Four on page 4.) 4. Property location 133 Lake Front Road Street Address Putnam Valley City/Town PVCSD Village (if any) =Putnam County 00 - - School District 5. Property identification (see tax bill or assessment roll) Tax map number or section/block/lot 62.10 -2 -5 Type of property: Residence Commercial _ Description: Single family residence Farm Industrial TOWN OF P UTNAM VALLEY Vacant land Other RP -524 (10 /02) 2 rr xT i ry 0 lvr Olt�tiirliION NEC _SSAn r 1 it DETERivlUNE V AJXjV1 Of VROPERi-St (If additional explanation or documentation is necessary, please attach) Information to support the value of property claimed in Part One, item 7 (complete one or more): I . Purchase price of property: .......................... a. Date of purchase: b. Terms: ........................ $ Cash Contract Other (explain) c. Relationship between seller and purchaser (parent - child, in -laws, siblings, etc.): d. Personal property, if any, included in purchase price (furniture, livestock, etc.; attach list and sales tax receipt): 2. _ Property has been recently offered for sale (attach copy of listing agreement, if any): When and for how long: How offered: Asking price: $ 3. ✓ Property has been recently appraised (attach copy): When: 2004 By whom: Beshear Purpose of appraisal: Determine market value Appraised value: $ 260.000 ' iPC r� "i �n iv�ila:n Cr ti �7 Des I f7 of y � L-nprc vern MIC lccatcd on :n-- pn3p rty, includii�g.year of construction and present condition: Two bedroom, one bath residence witrh enclosed porch. House has no heat or hot water and is unimproved since its construction in 1930a The se`ptic system does, not,rneet code and. he proerty „floods in the,_sprmg _.- 5. Buildings have been recently remodeled, constructed or additional improvements made: Cost $ Date Started: Date Completed: Complainant should submit construction cost details where available. 6. Property is income producing (e.g., leased or rented), commercial or industrial property and the complainant is prepared to present detailed information about the property including rental income, operating expenses, sales volume and income statements. 7. Additional supporting documentation (check if attached) - I.% ___ -I-- - -a] I op r Addendum to Complaint on R, 13n Owner: Kenneth Geraghty Property: 133 Lake Front Road, Putnam Valley, NY Tax map number: 62.10-2-5 I was present at Town Hall on May 25 for my Board of Assessment Review but was - given an appointment for the next evening due to the number of hearings scheduled. My schedule does not permit me to be in attendance on May 26 so I am submitting this addendum in place of a personal appearance. Please consider the following points: 1. The subject property has no heat or hot water. 2.. The -Town. Building Inspector'Nas etOrmi tied -that the sewage disposal system is.. not adequate for year ;round -use, ,;and -the Town hEsippose -d a,res triction'"fi tmg'� ' w611-water- operation to 'summer use _'Ori.y, copy.o .easement att 3 A'portion of the —zproperty -floods ein'If 67'si p qV fT& di-d renders the diVdtp access- rood'_to .-th e-, ho_u's'e'"u --s npa�able..' The Tax Assessor visited the property several years '_ --'- _ - -.-- - 11 -_. - ''. � - - 1. ago and noted this fact in is'file. 4. The property was appraised in March 2004 at $260,000. The 4--i-_ appraiser noted IlAdk-6 h6it. . A,7W8: of the ' b unaware . 0--sda�dnat flooding, gj-sqwa - ----- sewage -.pro, an7dwater S 1t is estimated to cost about $10,000 to bung' d.st-f i sufficient t-landfll-t9 cure the flooding and t6': install -id6M'.seWa gp.d is _ o_sa ' _, y .Subtracting tracting this amount from tr-am)raiser's value of $260,000 yields-the proposed -asses- —ent--nf Respectfully submitted, Kenneth G. Geraghty I RP -524 (10102) 3 .w.�_1 1'il`1;T _!0_1 1.1I�S-F -1\ E— iD"I X I. u Ho >... ._.s.a. .. .... -.. .> .... •... A. UNEQUAL ASSESSMENT (Complete items 1-4) 1. The assessment is unequal for the following reason: (check a or b) a._ The assessed value is at a higher percentage of value than the assessed value of other real property on the assessment roll. b._ The assessed value of real property improved by a one, two or three family residence is at a higher percentage of full (market) value than the assessed value of other residential property on the assessment roll or at a higher percentage of full (market) value than the assessed value of all real property on the assessment roll. 2. The complainant believes this property should be assessed at % of full value based on one or more of the following (check one or more): a._ The latest State equalization rate for the city, town or village in which the property is located is %. b._ The latest residential assessment ratio established for the city, town or village in which the residential property is located. Enter latest residential assessment ratio only if property is improved by a one, two or three family residence %. c.— Statement of the assessor or other local official that property has been assessed at %. d._ Other (explain on attached sheet). 3. Value of property from Part one # 7 ............................................................ ............................... $ 4. Complainant believes the assessment should be reduced to ......................... ............................... $ B. EXCESSIVE ASSESSMENT (Check one or more) The assessment is excessive for the following reason(s): I. ✓ The assessed value exceeds the full value of the property. a.Assessed value of property ......................... ............................... .................... ....................... $ 300.000 b. Complainant believes that assessment should be reduced to full value of (Part one #7) .............. $ 250.000 c.Attach list of parcels upon which complainant relies for objection, if applicable. 2. The taxable assessed value is excessive because of the denial of all or portion of a partial exemption. a.Specify exemption (e.g., senior citizens, veterans, school tax relief [STAR]) b. Amount of exemption claimed ............................................................... ............................... $ c.Amount granted, if any: ......................................................................................................... $ d. If application for exemption was filed, attach copy of application to this complaint. 3. lmproper calculation of transition assessment. (Applicable only in approved assessing unit which has a.Transition assessment. ............................................................................................................ $ b.Transition assessment claimed ............................................................... ............................... $. C. UNLAWFUL ASSESSMENT (Check one or more) The assessment is unlawful for the following reason(s): 1. Property is wholly exempt. (Specify exemption (e.g., nonprofit organization)) 2. Property is entirely outside the boundaries of the city, town, village, school district or special district in which it is designated as being located. 3. Property has been assessed and entered on the assessment roll by a person or body without the authority to make the entry. 4. Property cannot be identified from description or tax map number on the assessment roll. 5. Property is special franchise property, the assessment of which exceeds the final assessment thereof as determined by the State Board of Real Property Services. (Attach copy of State Board certificate.) D. 11IISCLASSIFICATION (Check one) The property is misclassified for the following reason (relevant only in approved assessing unit which establish homestead and non - homestead tax rates): Class designation on the assessment roll: ................... 1. Complainant believes class designation should be .... 2. The assessed value is improperly allocated between homestead and non - homestead real property. Allocation of assessed value on assessment roll Homestead ........... S Non – Homestead... $ Claimed allocation RF.524 (10102) 4 _..�.._. - .....�. __.:. - ., -.:- 'I'Alt�'��'UtS�t: �il✓5�GNA1C]ON Ur1�S1riV'!l',A °l.',lVl;'1'"l3 K;E"�tilvil�Lrl�v'i'.:::¢...... =.. � - -._�- �. 1, 1 as complainant (or officer thereof) bcmliy designate to act as my representative in any and all proceedings before the board of assessment review of the city /townNillaocounty of for purposes ofrevviewing the assessment of my real property as it appears on the (year) tentative assessment toll of sacb assessing unit Date Signature of owner (or officer tbereof) PART FIVE: CERTIFICATION I citify that all statements made on this application are true and correct to be best of my knowledge, and belief, and I understand that die making of any wMfa1 fake statement of material fact herein will subject me to the provisions of the Penal Law relevant to the making and filing of false instruments. so, 9.�r- v V Date PART SIX: STIPULATION The complainant (or complainant's representative) and assessor (or assessor designated by a majority of the board of assessors) whose signatures appear below stipulate that the following assessed value is to be applied to the above described property on the (year) assessment roll: band $ Total S (Cheek boot if stipulation approves exemption indicated in Part Three, section 13.2. or C.).) Complainant or representative Assessor pate SPACE BELOW FOR USE OF BOARD OF ASSESSMENT REVMW Disposition .C7Unegual,assesslnent pExcessive assessment t�untawfw assessment"_. t`�Miscl�.ssification ORatification of stipulated assesstnentONo change in assessment Rea_coa Vote on Complaint OAR cogicurr 0Ail concur except 0 against ❑abstain ❑ absent Name ❑ against [abstain ❑ absent Name Decision by Tentative assessment Claimed assessment Board of Assessment Review Total assessment S $ $ Transition assent (if any) .. $ $ $ Exempt amount ........................ S $ $ Taxable assessment .................. S $ $ Class designation and allocation of assessed value (if any): Homestead ............................. $ $ Non-homestead ....... ............... $ S Date notification m27ed to complainant RP -525 (1198) New York State Board of Real Property Services NQTIGF �F O FTE Mrly a n -ROAR SSESSY N REVI W c.. For (City, Town, Village or Cou y) L Wenrtilk C. Oero -5k 7 P.O. &k 35aq H06016en, NJ 070-30 (-10� /0 — I:p S Tax map section /block /lot # ( 3 3 46 `Fro t KOJ . 42abVa JIA Ualleu Location of property)if different than address of Complainant Name and address of Complainant The tentative assessed value of $ ,3DD, o82) for this property: a. 0 has been reduced to an assessed value of Land $ b.0 has not been reduced. Total $ o. a d Your complaint was based upon a contention that your assessment should be changed because of the following: e ssessed Valuation 0 Classification xemption ❑ Other The Board of Assessment Review has made this determination for reasons set forth below: Assessed Valuation a. The current full market value of your property was determined to be 19 0(1) The proof of value you presented was adequate. ^ u (2). 1'he proof of value you presented was inadequate because: C) 0 i, the supporting data was insufficient 0 ii. sales were not comparable to your property 0 iii. the written appraisal was incomplete 0 iv. the income and expense statement was incomplete (income producing property) 0 V. the construction cost details were incomplete. b. The uniform percentage of value applicable in this assessing unit is p (])The proof of assessment ratio that you presented was adequate. ❑ (2) The proof of assessment ratio that you presented was inadequate because: 0 i. insufficient data was used in calculating an assessment ratio 0 ii. sufficient evidence was presented by the assessor to refute the residential assessment ratio (RAR) or the State equalization rate 0 iii. the State ratios are inapplicable due to a revaluation 0 iv. the ratio that you presented was not the correct residential assessment ratio (RAR) 0 v. the rate that you presented was not the correct State equalization rate. c. The physical characteristics and inventory of your property were determined to be: ❑ (1) correct ❑ (2) incorrect. cont. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Division of Environmental Health Services 4 Geneva Road, Brewster, New York 10509 (914) 278 -6130 a w - n L ft 'din f_'_ ,.��,e�� ti..�"- �'.L'i': a r 57 PCHD PERMIT k� Street Address Town Village Cit Tax Grid Number . WELL LOCATION %Zc -¢-� Pte, ate„ WELL OWNER Name Mailing Address (3,.r OPrivate O a 0 z1&& Public USE OF WELL ®' RESIDENTIAL ❑ PUBLIC SUPPLY (JAIR/COND/HiAT PUMP 0 ABANDONED 1 - primary ✓ O BUSINESS O FARM O TEST /OBSERVATION O OTHER (specify 2 - secondary O"INDUSTRIAL O INSTITUTIONAL O STAND -BY O AMOUNT OF USE 1. YIELD SOUGHT gpm /# PEOPLE SERVED /EST. OF DAILY USAGE__gal EXISTING SUPPLY O TEST /OBSERVATION DRILLING ADDITIONAL SUPPLY REASON FOR I ' DRILLING I WELL TYPE I ®DRILLED DRIVEN_ []DUG 13GRAVEL OOTHER I IS WELL SITE SUBJECT TO FLOODING? �� -�S��. NO IF WELL IS LOCATED IN A REALTY SUBDIVISION, NAME OF SUBDIVISION: Lot No. WATER WELL CONTRACTOR: Name ',. o.", Address: IS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY AVAILABLE TO SITE: YES 1-"' NO NAM: OF PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY: 1,(� Lwc , i4 iZ,„ S'- T OWN /VIL /CITY DIST&VCQ -TO: pRnPFPTY :FR ^M 1?EAPE WATER MAIN: - ,__. _. - ;:._- .._..,,:._..: LOCATION SKETCH & SOURCES OF CONTAMINATION PROVIDED (30N SEPARATE SHEET 7 11?1q6, — 4�- (date) (Aignature) PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A WATER WELL This permit to construct one water well as set forth above is granted under the provisions of Subpart 5 -2 of Part 5 of the New York State Sanitary Code, and provided that within thirt7 (30) days of the completion of water well construction, the applicant shall: 1. Pump the well until the water is clear. 2. Disinfect the well in accordance with the requirements of the Putnam County Health Department attached to this permit. 3. Submit a Well Completion Report on a form provided by the Putnam County Health Department. During all well drilling operations, the applicant shall any and all water or waste products from such well drill property and in such a manner as not to degrade or of r Date of Issue-.&I 1��_ Date of Expiratiod b l_. Pe i take appropriate action to assure that ng operations be contained on this Ise contaminate surface or groundwater. Issulne Official Permit is Non - Transferrable White coy: HD File Pink copy: Owner 3/89 Yellow copy: Bldg. Insp. Orange copy: Well Driller NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Specific Waiver Bureau of Community Sanitation and Food Protection from Requirements of Part 75 and Appendix 75- A,10NYCRR ...:.- ,...r. �.. � -_... :..:..._ - .�.._ _. - __ " - - ., z :t. -�....:,.�,._.., ....: -' ..' n��. a'• �' ��!.'. c�s�h _cl>r��t.,��e3;Trt }a ?�ias�' aye!; r.'° _;T.- �,:.., Name of Applicant ; l�G�TY /? �— Cit /Town State Zip No. rest xx,, Address - [�J 7;:,c/0i�4f.16 ,20 Nc!l;Am VA Lt c /U `%. /01 No. Street City(rown State Zip Site Location (j 3 ic;AyJT Sfr �� ,� �t l/�1GC�� %`i 10i ra • e • Reason why site does not meet 10NYCRR Appendix 75 -A (check appropriate box(es)): Separation distance cannot be achieved. Excessive slope. High groundwater. Inadequate depth to bedrock or impermeable layer. j Soil unsuitable. Other. (explain) ........ 1! V. ANV,l'.............° y.. ....yr?.g............�.:is . ....................... . .................................................................................................................................................................................................................. ............................... 3. The proposed design may have the following limitations (check appropriate box(es)): JIncreased risk of well or spring contamination. Increased risk of surface water contamination. Expected design life of the system will be diminished. Operation of sewage system is subject to mechanical problems. Other(explain) ........................................................................................................................................................................... ............................... ................................................................................................................................................................................................................. ............................... Additional information attached Construction pursuant to this waiver request should not pose any foreseeable health or environmental problems. In accordance with New York State Department of Health Administrative Rules and Regulations, Part 75.6 (b), a waiver is hereby granted. This waiver may be revoked by th is uing official for a change in conditions for which this waiver was granted. f tpkE ENTATIVE OF MMISS10NER OF HEALTH n � ORIGINAL -Local Health Agency `n= J. 11 ............................. ............................... COPY - Applicant /Design Professional d4fff - ..............� ................. DATE DOH -1326 (7/92) (GEN -152) 14.16.4 (2187) —Text 12 PROJECT I.D. NUMBER 617.21 SEAR . ...... .. ,F, — . ` Y State Environmental Ouality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I— PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) 1. APPLICANT /SPONSOR 2. PROJECT NAME Geraghty/Town of Putnam Valley Wildwood Knolls 3. PROJECT LOCATION: Municipality Putnam Valley County Putnam 4. PRECISE LOCATION (Street address and road Intersections,. prominent landmarks, etc., or provide map) 133 Front Road, Town of PUtnam Valley, TM #62.10 -2 -5. Town of Putnam Valley Park District TM #62.10 -2 -4 5. IS PROPOSED ACTION: ❑ New ❑ Expansion ( Modification/alteration 6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: Construction of water well on '' property to provide seasonal water 7. AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: Initially 1/3 acres Ultimately 1/3 acres 8. WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRICTIONS? ® Yes ❑ No If No, describe briefly 9. WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? ®.Residential _. ❑Industrial _._ . OCorn;^cr W. n' '.` -- . . n k;;rl�Llture`- - :_..1 Fa�n,FoissUt? pen space j. 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAL)? ❑ Yes QNo If yes, list agency(s) and permitlapprovals Possible Wetland Permit 11. DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? ❑ Yes ® No If yes, list agency name and pe►mlt/app.roval 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT /APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? C1 Yes 13No I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant/sponsor name: Date: Signature: If the action Is In the Coastal Area, and you are a state a9ency, complete' the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment OVER ,)A 'TUB cp Q N 3 2 cn t �� 91.24 ti 52 - G5 _ �r r 5 X111' ' 33 • L��Y ilO �' A k \ S s to y 34* Z5 e 4. ,--, h 10 �, Ne f'C arX;I, # s be- vj `9 ow r i LU 50 040 O t t C rte! Ffar • �9 E n. Town of Putnam valley TOWN BOARD MEETING Presented by Supervisor Santos:. RESOLUTION #R 97 -234 Cap RA6 14 7-14 j �OD�f1 JUNE 10, 1997 BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Putnam Valley will approve the drilling of a well on Town and /or District property, TM #62.10 -2 -4, for the purpose of providing one (1) resident with seasonal water, in accordance with prior water delivery schedule. IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED, that the cost of drilling this well will be amortized to this user at an annual rate not to exceed $585.00, which will also include annual operating costs. Seconded by Councilman Ferrante; unanimously carried. OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF PUTNAM ss.: TOWN OF PUTNAM VALLEY I have compared the preceding or annexed copy of RESOLUTION #R 97 -34 TOWN BOARD MEETING June 10, 1997 with the original filed in this office and DO HEREBY CERTIFY the same to be a correct transcript therefrom and of the whole of such original. . IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my name and affixed the seal of said town this 11th day of June 19 97 y Depu&X Town Clerk, To n of Pu nam alley 39 -77 50th Street Woodside, NY 11377 March 11, 1997 Robert Morris Putnam County Environmental Heath Services 4 Geneva Road Brewster, NY 10509 Dear Mr. Morris, Enclosed is an application for a well permit for a home in Wildwood Knolls, Putnam Valley. You already have received an application for this site from a co- owner, Dorothy Werthner. I understand the original application lacked certain documents which prevented you from considering it. The new application includes the following documentation. 1. Location sketch of the property and well 2. Copy of notification letter sent to adjacent property owner Van Farber 3. Copy gf �eturn:l;eceict for delive-v of notificaticn lett r to Van r=arher _ Please advise me if there are any other documents you require in order to process our application. I can be reached at 212 - 640 -3754. Sincerely, R 1510 161 809 US Postal Service Receipt for Certified Mail 4 .. ._. ,.... .... -.. .. ._ AIL. wG♦ �srn �� ' _.i O O Q `o 0 Ln rn cm co M to a a Do not use f or International I Maa• l S ee reverse) _ Sent to Qn F ? L /f h Street & Nu ber 9 d,,L<S.tVe�'eW. , � ia� Po ice, State, & ZIP Coffe •_,n /1//(:) rO +L1 i S �n f t- ('rT Postage $ Certified Fee Special Delivery Fee Restricted D ' I a ed ipt i o -z ressee's ress ge s 1 Postm or D SPV SENDER: ■Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services. I I also wish to receive the th ■ ■Complete items 3, 4a, and 4b. f following services (for an in ■ ■ Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can return this e extra fee): > ■ SENDER: ■Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services. I I also wish to receive the th ■ ■Complete items 3, 4a, and 4b. f following services (for an in ■ ■ Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can return this e extra fee): > ■ ■Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece, or orrthe back tffspace does not t t , 0 Addressee's Address o ai PS Forrn 3811, Decembek 1994 Domestic Return Receipt Kenneth G. Geraghty Hoboken, NJ 07030 NEIGHBOR NOTIFICATION LETTER Van Farber 1909 Christopher Place Harrisburgh, PA 17110 Property Owner Name: Address: Tax Map Number: Re: Dear Mr. Farber, February 26, 1997 Ruddy, James & Geraghty, Arthur & Werthner, Dorothy 133 Lake Front Road, Putnam Valley, NY 62.10 -2 -5 Putnam County Department of Health's review of proposed well for the property at the above address Please be advised that an application for a well permit has been made to the Putnam County Department of Health. Aitacl�rci please find a copy of the iates"t §ite� -pan. If you have any questions, concerns or information which may influence the Department of Health's review of this application, you may call Mr. Robert Morris at the Health Department at 914 - 278 -6130 Extension 166. Sincerely, I�j a� / /��a3a-3 Ax i