Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1165DOCUMENT CONVERSION SERVICES PROVIDED BY IMAGING & MICROFILM ACCESS, INC. www.scanyourdocs.com 631- 589 -8100 25.57 -1 -51 BOX 11 JIM or IBM im 'L JA � Ir 46L Ll 01165 P Frank La Banca 2 Eldred Rd. New Fairfield, (203 ) 746 -450' CT. 06812 Mr. John Karell, Director Putnam County Health Dept. 110 Old Route 6 Carmel, New York 10512 Es /7 /91 t " Mr. Karell ^1 Mr. Morris, of your office, Mr. Boyd of the Boyd Well- r" Drilling Company and Mr. Tim Simpkins, New Fairfield Sanitarian, have consulted me about a proposed well on the property adjacent to mine on Hopewell Drive in Putnam Lake.. Mr. Sal Lima is now the owner of ,record and while the majority of the parcel is in Connecticut, a tiny portion is in New York. • • i The.- proposed well - i.s -. -to -be .imstal.led- on the. -port ion...-of -.- the.-.. -. .. -.- __._._.._,_....._......... property that is in New York, within 50 feet of my septic system and within 5 feet of my .sideline and 5 feet of the road. In Mr. Boyd's words : he wishes to "sneak it on" and will attempt to make a deal with N.Y. and CT. authorities. This proposed well is not about water. There is another well on the property and the State of Connecticut refused to allow the proposed septic to be used with the existing well. Mr. Lima is not a victimized party .since he is not the original owner and has purchased the lot in the past year with full knowledge of its drawbacks and weaknesses. The property is listed as .226 of an acre. It doesn't meet the usual criteria for lot size. As you are probably aware this Ball Pond area has had its share of publicity for septic failures on small parcels. Although there was an illusion of a house on the property, the record shows that it had been abandoned, condemned and torn down. Mr, LaVelle, (New Fairfield town attorney) advised the Zoning Board of Appeals that this property is not eligible as a rebuild. As to the question of hardship, it would seem that Mr. Liana has created his own hardships. Mr. Simpkins is treating and has treated this case as a hot potato. The criteria established by the Board of Health is for the safety of the public. Dbelieve that to approve this well in N.Y. by a variance of the established restrictions would be wrong. t Please advise me of your decision. r :- Very truly yours, G"✓VV ....:_. _ .._...._..._...__ _ :.... __ _.,. .-Fra:rrk- .Pullrrian, C le -Bradley & keeve ATT 1cdT1(�'A' Jam a "Mm C moat NORM 0M10fl ►. ►YTOM am= R RLMR a . i UNM A. aaaiMD •OVAOM t aroma a OWWme 1L 106 RL►Ll L ►IMAM n •�y9 •, q� , !'. 17J4I ,MM a "DAVA WJWV o oron LJHIIA �MLLLR a ¢IoM ame a Awsaw ow a.waLO Wauw a Rona ! I I . "6%WT K MooRMI JOw R spio"ML a J am.a a ao0aao oaw r aoonm oaJRw w WIMM Ma am m ►. AZUM. o UIO a a+nwwr mud hia JDVW a WOODO aaa . IRa a aDOY1IlII a70 p� L. COMM aww a as"a. CALM F. *ARM MLJMnm, cart L"a" Bridgeport 330 -2112 MMY M. TEL s .._ VJZAMM • JIA1a LAL"M anwo 6GLa awwom G aaamM MOM" a "m M=AM C&AW U IVAL a our USUM LOL06= awn Comm L. OaLRMa MTUM K a" Mon t 04106 La &WCJa aIMcm 'November 13, 199.0 Mr. Don.Kamps, Chairman Zoning Board of Appeals Town of New Fairfield P.O. Box 8896 New Fairfield, CT 06812 Re: Appeal No. '62 -90 Application of Salvatore Lima, 10 Hopewell Drive Dear Don: . -- Mr.. Lima has .. applied.. _for. .set back. - .and.. minimum .lot variances in order to build a house on an undersized lot. lot is approximately 0.226 acres.in an R -44, one -acre zone. tt� Coos Mme-Mm aw0ft JU R.IIa Joe" R. Lama PM K a1LCOmWO ►LLa„oprimam alv.IOL WORCK OL • uusna a 02000 am= T. J" K "me ww► r was= man= La %VNIM "M size........ .._ - His The development of a nonconforming lot is controlled by Section 2.3 of�the new zoning ordinance. Mr. Lima should apply for a zoning permit in accordance with Section 2.3 rather than for a variance. The minutes of the Public Hearing of October 25, 1990 indicate that Mr. Lima's attorney.called the attention of the Board to Section 2.4.4 of the zoning ordinance. That section permits an existing building or structure which is legally nonconforming to be rebuilt if it "is damaged or destroyed by fire, explosion, vandalism, act.of. God or the public enemy -" The ,property contained - an abandoned a_nd ;uninhabitable; burldng� which was'"destroyed by demolition. Section 2.4.3(b) permits maintenance`` and repair. wo' keep a structure in sound condition', which wou'l:d - oFt..include demolition and replacement. Bridgeport amter. $50 Alain Street. P.O. Boa 7006. Bridgeport. CT 06601.7006 Tel. (203) 330.2000 Fie (203) 576.8888 ... ...,. .. _ . rnnn r.... .IWI, 1C 4 [n -n Page 2 Pullman, Comley, Bradley & Reeves ATTORNEYS AT LAW The zoning ordinance allows ordinary repair and maintenance, and allows replacement of an existing use which is suddenly destroyed by an event outside the property owner's reasonable control. This lot did not contain a nonconforming use in lawful existence on the effective date of the zoning ordinance as provided by Section 2.4.2. Mr. Lima has no basis to claim a variance of either set backs or minimum lot size. Sihcerely, Michael N. Lavelle MNL /pm cc: Cheryl Reedy, First Selectman i .i JOHN M, GA6S'OY. JR. CONALO MC.n.RTL/•NG K /'CEDING DECOR F ••I+.• :D F. � iC L•.[R• MARTIN A. RAOCR �••G MAS P FIISH • . GAIL C. -CTAGE.ART F•C­AD 7; ARCONTI THOMAS G. PARISOT DA4ICL E. CASAGRANOC' FREDERICK L. MUROLO OF COVNSEL w:LLIAM • SECON. JR. J. WARREN UPSON CHARLES C. HART 3.2 MILTON •A,eCYMOUR 7 1 ­"go o ..lo - �HI ♦!LD 4.0 A ••.11+CwJla Yal . DrIfYaO Wa,Y 1 ►rl. .a. ...., _._ . .... Ow10 ..O CALIrOrrl. i .DrinaD A'so 1..9. YO.. SECOR, CASSIDY a MCPARTLAND P. C. DANBURY OFFICE ATTORNEYS AT LA: ": RESIDENT ATTORNEYS V.'00STER FLAZH\ M ARTIN A. RADER. JR. 301 MAIN STREET RICHARD D. ARCCNTI DANIEL C. CASAGRANOE DANBURY• CONNECTICUT C6E10.5856 _ (203) 743.9145 WATERBURY OFFICE 41 CHURCH STRECT POST Orrice 60% role WATERBURY. CONNECTICUT 06723 -r618 (203) 757.0261 CHESHIRE OFFICE 325 SOUTH MAIN STREET January >2 2 , 1 9 8 8 CHCSHIRE.,CONNECTICUT 06410.3113 - - -^ _ • • (2O3) r72 -5001 ._ _..__....__ Honorable Ru s s e 11 G e r ow -- - =�_ -- •r:itst •Selectman._ _ ' Town of New.-Fairfield P.O. Box 8896 liew Fairfield, CT 06810 Re: Abandoned House on Hopewell Drive rk= Dear Mr. Gerow: Reference is made to a November, 12, 1987 letter to me from then. First. Selectman Reedy. The letter, a copy of which -is attached,, refers. to a house on Hopewell Drive v.,hich is = - • apparent•ly- falling down.., . Acco:rd.ipg. to st-atements received f rom neighbors (copies of which are also attac;,ea), the house is owned by Daniel ,William Dugay and Veronica.Dugay, has*-been vacant and, unattended for at least 17 years, and has become a health and fire hazard. Mrs. Reedy as' 's for my advise- "as'to the procedure for the removal of this house from the property.' Section 29 -393 of the General Statutes sets forth the procedure for removal of structures that are dangerous or in disrepair. The statute provides in pertinent part; On receipt of information from the local fire marshal or from any other authentic source that any building in-his jurisdiction, due to lack of exit facilities, fire, deterioration, catastrophe or other cause, F is in such condition as to be a hazard to any person or persons, the building inspector shall immediately make an inspection by:.,_- -: =' himself or by his assistant, and may make orders'. -for additional exit facilities or the repair or aLe)ration of the building if the same is susceptible to repair or both or for the removal of such buildinc or my ;portion thereof if�' anal such order is in t' e in . rests —of" public safety, (Emphasis added.) Non. Russell Gerow January 22, 1983 Page 2 As this statute makes clear, the building inspector is required to immediately inspect any house which is hazardous, upon receipt of such information from "any authentic source." The building inspector is empowered to order any necessary repairs, j and, upon a determination that. 'removal of the building "necessary in the interests of public. safety°, he may order .such k removal. Thus_ the first t.eg_._is to have Mr. Bjelko and the Town's fire narshal immediately inspect the house. Their- "�inairigs shall--- dictate -.- the -- additional_,_action, if any, that must be' .taken to remedy the situation. rote that. Section .29 -393 permit "s- .a_;`M - "�:"_•_�- -°- building inspector to enter onto the property between 9:00-a;m - - - and 5:00 p.m. to perform this inspection. By carbon copy of this letter, I am requesting Mr. Bjelko toy_ inform me of the results of his and the fire marshal's inspections. Please call-me' if you have• any questions on this letter. Very truly yours, - ,L SECOR, CASSIDY 6 McPARTLAND,. P.C. /qran ttorneys - E. Casagrande DEC:kah Enclosure cc: 'Mr. Steve Bjelko Gail T. McTaggart, Esq. a DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Division of Environmental Health Services 110 OLD ROUTE SIX CENTER, CARMEL, N.Y. 10512 (914) 225 -0310 APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT A WATER WELL PCHD PERMIT # WELL LOCATION Street Address, Town/Village/.City Tax Grid Number WELL OWNER Name h/gAore Lima, Mailing Address Rd Private O Public USE OF WELL 1 - primary 2 - secondary r RESIDENTIAL O BUSINESS 13 INDUSTRIAL O PUBLIC SUPPLY O AIR /COND /HEAT PUMP O FARM - O TEST /OBSERVATION b INSTITUTIONAL O STAND -BY 0 ABANDONED O OTHER (specify, p AMOUNT OF USE YIELD SOUGHT S' gpm /# REPLACE EXISTING SUPPLY O NEW SUPPLY NEW DWELLING PEOPLE SERVED ,s /EST. OF DAILY USAGE 5bo gal O TEST /OBSERVATION Q ADDITIONAL SUPPLY 13 DEEPEN EXISTING WELL REASON .FOR DRILLING DETAILED REASON FOR 'DRILLING WELL TYPE 10DRILLED O DRIVEN ODUG O GRAVEL. O OTHER IS WELL SITE SUBJECT TO FLOODING? YES :V"' NO IF WELL IS LOCATED IN A REALTY SUBDIVISION, NAME OF SUBDIVISION: Lot No. WATER WELL CONTRACTOR: Name L wd Ar�e5ictn WV ,ll Co mac-. Address: R E 45";j Carmel klYw5*1Z IS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY AVAILABLE TO SITE: YES ✓NO NAME OF PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY: TOWN /VIL /CITY ...DISTANCE" TO'PROPERTY FROK-NEAREST WATER• - MAIN:-- ..._- _ .._ ... _ _ ........,...._ . _._ ._..._...._.... LOCATION SKETCH .& URCES OF CONTAMINATION PROVIDED 06N SEPARATE SHEET I i (dat (si nature) PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A WATER WELL This permit to construct one water well as set forth above is granted under the provisions of Subpart 5 -2 of Part 5 of the New York Statd'Sanitary Code, and provided that within thirty (30) days of the completion of water well construction, the applicant shall: 1. Pump the well until the water is clear. 2. Disinfect the well in accordance with the requirements of the Putnam County Health Department attached to this permit. 3. Submit a Well Completion Report on a form provided by the Putnam County Health Department. During all well drilling operations, the applicant shall take appropriate action to assure that any and all water or waste products from such well drilling operations be contained on this property and in such a manner as not to degrade or otherwise contaminate surface or groundwater. Date of Issue: 19 Date of Expiration 19 Permit Issuing Official Permit is Non - Transferrable, White copy: HD File Pink copy: Owner 3/89 Yellow copy: Bldg. Insp. Orange copy: Well Driller so 1 t FXI3TINlr PRopotp WELD BE k- ASA Oki DO V-D i • W E,,L L • �\ a , I W �..a J dew sephL NO 6TrtE� r(AJGWAI w I�,i�� SYoo <M� ` ` � �r�po� /"mil �P�''� -{ten • S _ . �• � ilk 41* Conr�. CpS p� 15� n;w .Sig► LVATO R E MA ;F TOvJN OF' SEC, z3 8L ' w I i . °JTA"TE wNE 46 PER FIL-W MAP OF PlJ l' A l.Alt -6O." D 1 . q31 I lam' I 191~ I 9315 METAL IT FWD. � PD�E NN. O.4I 01.1 trlw�C O.DO a3rn �� y�, q3z� . • .. � .. 1­• _72 � I.PI %! aFZEA� 9 821 SF= � 71-4 � o. It oc �^ 15U RVEY OF PROP PREPA -6 ) FOR . 5.LLVA 0RE ROS I NA LIMA LOT NQ 45M -q C)b .5 5HOWt4 ON FOVIK'TH MAP 100 '.PtJTNAM LAKE: F1LE.0 MAP NQ I-A C. FIL, wfi 2zoal �bVVN OF t 50N AM ' co -N.Y. TOWN OF NEW FAIRFIELD FiAIRFI EI::O & LT LE ua j. !►" l ' �.{ I t4omas riley-'drehitect ' I ,• t I li I ! 82 9rdSSy (��Irl St. bethel cE. 068o1; z03 •791 674$' i; I• `Ir i• �i . !' I 3 Aug 1990 ' I Attorney,Anthony,Ghecas + 1 (}} I I I � , - � + � 1 i�jljl+F1',,,� �• 1 l Ij :, �}I 'j 11 I Yr •,r �. , • 'I' I � I�.' �i � .i,, ' , j'f )�. , jt •�� I E r t t ii i I� 1➢ ll 1 1 I (��. Thomas J { Ryan:; �� S Attorne !at. Law; 1 18 t 2MI•I. +' {i I ui a �,.1 57 Nortb :Stree't'i Danbury; Connecticut 06810 ,Dear Tony. 1.,'t I. I � 4 1 V amp ,sending you this letter as a follow -up to our conver- Y satione' regarding the site visit I made to the Lima p operty iocated at 10 Hopewell Road, New Fairfield, Conn"ecti.cut, can 3 Aug 1990,- I was accompanied to the site by Mr:..Steave miBjelko,: uilding Official for the Town of New Fairfield, 'ftt,C6nnec�ll1iclut. ! {s�j f'fier, 1111ooking; at -the - bui.lding, it is my professianal�opitl- ion'that..tne structure is unsound and.unsafe for accup411 - i cy';;,,,or, re -use in 'a retrofit and rehabilitation process. Y 11'found that the components of the wood structure are deter - !!; :'iorated to the 'point of unsalvageability. The foundation .i','is in an unusable,condition_ also. This is evidenced by the fact.that numerous.eracks,have.developed, the walls are out of,'plumb, Vi and the bonding Iis' oui of level. This condition �'.�is "often a:'symptom ofi a lack.'of', or improperly placed, footings under the wallsin' question. This is the probable `c�ause,fQr. the( foundation`to, do the "walking" it has experi- ! Fenced 'over.itime. i; �Ifeel that-the client's interests and welfare would be +best;geryed by, demolition of the existing "building ", and ItartingEover,from scratch.. I would mention at this time j(,1�ha ince!l;t a lot is'non- conforming, a variance would be equirdd'1 tq 'Qbt'ain; a zoning approval.' Also, some special '•k' onsiderit�.'ons would have to be taken into account for the 1. 111.1 .iomoval! 9fi�wPat ;,appears to ;be asbestos siding. i1 J z r P #k` 1981 ROUGH RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY. NO CITY WATER �IOa ' OTf1aaT Astassoss• MAP *LOCK PASCaL SUMMARY . _ LOTS 3 7 q 9 AMOURT CAPO OWNER HIGH DdV9LOPaw8• 14AP LOT mvnsaws Roma COMM DWLG i -! 9303 to 9308 LOW OUTBLDO. - RECORD OF TRANSFER DATE VOL. PC SAL¢ REMARKS: '/So 01 LOTS SWAMP NO RD. color. W VERONICA LOT *— -- INDUST. • atoll LEVEL ACRES TOTAL TOWN Of NEW FAIRFIELD, CONN. UFSITao APPRAISAL Co.. BAST HASTroRD, conk. An J Nr TOTAL DWLG UTBLDG. _ l LOTS i COMM, ' INDUST. ACRES TOTAL ! DWLG OUTBLDG LOTS Comm. INDUST. ACRES INTERIOR INSPECTED `, TOTAL DATE: /.a 80.. OWIG OUTBLDG. ACREAGE COMPUTATIONS LOTS LAND TYPE $ OR AGttES PRICa TOTAL DEPR VALUE ASSESSMENT COMM. HOUSE LOT 7 0 / S o ci INDUST. CLEARED FRONT -- �� A. - 5 5 0 3sv Acmes ; TOTAL PASTURE FRONT - REAR a DWLG WOODS & SPROUT FRONT - - ..2.20 OUTBLDG. REAR LOTS WASTE fRONT of COMM. REAR INDUST. ACRES ' TOTAL LOT COMPUTATIONS t LAND FACTORS OWLG fROAT DEPTH STREW PRICE DEPTH % mat R ►Kitt TOTAL OETR. j .IMi VALUE - ' °• ' • ASSES HILLY NO CITY SEWER OUTBLOG � r - SMENT ROUGH NO CITY WATER _ LOTS HIGH GRAVEL RD. COMM LOW DIRT RD. INDUST. SWAMP NO RD. ACRES LEVEL PAVED TOTAL TOWN Of NEW FAIRFIELD, CONN. UFSITao APPRAISAL Co.. BAST HASTroRD, conk. 7 �TA� -E . OF ''' 4 � r �. • SHEET ANDOVER 16 • N. M • 1 x 1 wn2d ( - - � � I �I� � � •i, , ��f� tea• r • i:� I• •. ..� 1 •� 161 15 .141 3 i i2 Y �'fw ,� . s `0, AD QI _ nl v , 1 4 23 (31 • I - 4' t31� (31 s•f p, '^ 'r ( 3121 13 �� 1 I = y s e i ^ (3 15 ✓: `J «`'' Q 1 • (L :~ 1 w p I RN END j '1 I 1319)6 � ( 319) (� ,. 2 D► 21.1 . 3fa 2�1 20 . ' p 14 c (3: 1 24) p • 19 _ .. 'yi . ROAD 6a 7, 92:; (32 ac (329; 4. s11'9 9�i.� p \ 7• L / I _ ( A � s 1 1 ( 330.. � 44 / 0 ) _ V (aa tiai` = 1 / 413) (3,34 ,) 2d 6 9 . 2 001 2 311 (339 , .. `9A N '� 0 13 r 13401 (341) 13421 ` rY: 14 = ' iJ' I (3431 (34 s 1 .t -170. 18 419 jo 419 •.,' , ap / 9 o lb 40 . ,, , ,, (> h FREE HOL D i s Ise � • 1 ' a ..o•:•� ..,I2i�3 too. 60• 2 � :>; Yt':,?• ', ��' �. ) i (3461 "� 11986 : 4 'd 11�e' `_ i .a.•. Iq 'fi,•`,ifl >. '!r —. �.,�tTyt9� 1 7.44' . O A� -•r. '. 0 r15.19' (9339) - (III : — .— '�929q• (3491 1 (9337j • = 3 ta6o) •a ;. .: 4 9290 g (,GSM • Q .94� 1 `:,• r _109 —.201 1lt`tt 5 , • s ��A ` •� • i192e 4 �' . _ G '� +1( 0?0,I1.86 . q : y -O I „ 6(9340) Om- . ~1U3r s 7 (39) o 1(3341 (3e9r (7•o 10 +�t0 Q 7 1 i01 13 (9342) 1 r i 70 —69V. 12 . 1 3 - t ' .,,�: 37.x►' ` .t9�14) 1n �: ,: .. fly . '19ze _ mss.- °' t 2 (96631 _ �10Jr9j. 12p t o Id 20 • �' • �� „ 1 ,Oy g 20 (356 . „ 0 � 07:46• R0: O 12 -oil q.1 'r e O 109i62r _ .1 a w D p „ ., . ro 1 • DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Division Of Environmental Health Services 110 Old Route Six Center, Carmel, New York 10512 (914) 225 -0310 Frank LaBlanca #2 Elder Road New Fairfield. CT 06812 Dear Mr. LaBlanca: July 24.'1991 s JOHN KARELL Jr.. P.E.. M.S. Public Health Director Re: Subsurface Sewage Disposal System This Department is in receipt of a application to construct a water well submitted by Boyd Well Drillers for Salvatore Lima. Hopewell Road. Town of Patterson. TM 425.57-1 -51. A survey of lots 9309 thru 9313. dated May 31. 1973. has been submitted to this Department. This survey shows the septic tank 60 feet and the 3bscrption trenches approximately 80 feet from the proposed well location on Mr. Lima's property. During our discussion on July 12. 1991 you stated that the septic system on your property was relocated to the front of the house near the existing walk. - - - -�- -Approval of -the relocation .or as- built plans -- for - -- -the.- septic system is. not.on file _. in the New Fairfield Health Department or Putnam County Health Department. The location of your septic system is critical to the review process. It is requested that a portion of your septic system be excavated, i.e.. the septic tank and the end of the absorption trenches nearest the proposed well to determine the exact location. It is understood you will be on vacation until August 6. If the above request is not performed before August 21 the review process will proceed using the location of the septic system shown on the survey on file in this Department. If you have any questions please contact me at ext. 320. Ver truly yours, eo Robert Morris Assistant Public Health Engineer RM /jp cc: (The attached) Mr. Tim Simpkins New Fairfield Health Department New Fairfield, CT 06812. Frank LaBlanca #2 Eldred Road New Fairfield, CT 06812 Salvatore Lima Ipsvitch Road Patterson, NY 12563 Boyd Artesian Well Co., Inc. Route 52 Carmel, NY 10512 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Division Of Environmental Health Services 110 Old Route Six Center, Carmel, New . York 10512 (914) 225-0310 Frank LaBlanca #2 Elder Road New Fairfield,' CT +6812 Dear Mr. LaBlanca: 3uly 24, 1991 EJ JOHN KARELL Jr., P.E., M.S. Public Health Director Re: Subsuriace Sewage Disposal System This Department is in receipt of a apolication to construct a water well submitted by Boyd Well Drillers for Salvatore Lima, Hopewell Road, Town of Patterson. TM 425.57 -1 -51. pia:. A survey of lots 9305 chru 9:13, dated May 31. 197', has been submitted to this Deoartmment. 7pis zurvey shows the =ept_c tank 80 ieet and the abscrption trenches approximately 80 feet from the proposed weil location. on Mr. Lima'= property. During our discussion on .iuiy 12, 1991 you stated that the septic system on your property was relocated to the front of the house.near the existing walk. Approval df the ; eiocat'ion' di--as= built 'plans -for the••septic system -•is- not•- •on••- file -_ . in the New Fairfield Health Department or Putnam County Health Department. The location of your septic system is critical to the review process. It is requested that a portion of your septic system be excavated, i.e., the septic tank and the end of the absorption trenches nearest the proposed well to determine the exact location. It is understood you will be on vacation until August 6. If the above request is not performed before August 21 the review process will proceed using the location of the septic system shown on the survey on file in this Department. If you have any questions please contact me at ext. 320. Very truly yours, I , Robert Morris Assistant Public Health Engineer RM /jp cc: (The attached) f IN INSPECTED; � DWLG . DATE: �p -')• 80.`` 7� OUTBLDG. ACREAGE COMPUTATIONS LOTS LAND TYPE a or AGREE PRICE TOTAL DEPII VALVE Tiil ASSESSMENT COMM. HOUSE LOT . '" / ? ; r.' O So o 09 o•fo e 70 /y.7-f-0 INO —US t. CLEARED FRONT A.- 1550 3.TQ ACRES REM TOTAL PASTURE FRONT _ DWLG REAR _ .2.2C) OUTBLDG.. WOODS i SPROUT FRONT Lors REM COMM. WASTE FRONT of INDUST. REM ACRES LOT COMPUI ATIONS I nose T I DI ►TN STRtR ►RICI folpTH K FRONT R PRICE I TOIAI —� airs. OR.INi yALUE TOWN OF NEW FAIRFIELD, CONN. TOTAL LAND FACTORS DWLG ASSESSMENT HILLY NO CITY SEWER OUTBLDG ROUGH NO CITY WATER LOTS HIGH GRAVEL RD. COMM. LOW DIRT RD. a INDUST. SWAMPY NO RD. ACRES LEVEL PAVED TOTAL UGIT'EO APPRAISAL CO.. LAST HART FORD, CORN. �7 U - R z r 1 1.981 - RESIDENTIAL P PROPERTY slot STR<RT A A68[6{0111• MAP • •LOCK PARCEL S SUMMARY v HOPEWELL D DRIVE 3 37 4 4 9 A AMOUNT 1 CARD 01MKLR O OUVELOPERS• MAP L LOT NUMBERS BONS D DWLG /-3 " " / -9303 to 9308 / O OUTBLDG. RECORD OF TRANSFER D DATE V VOL. PG SALE R REMARKS: 7,50 C LOTS COMM. W VERONICA L LOT z— - -- INDUST. - A ACRES O S ST /y /ti' ii lT 1C,' J ": A r TOTAL 1.2.3.2 •a (, DWLG_ 1 O OUTSLDG ..,Yy L LOTS _ _ COMM. Oi ' • •- INDUST. ACRES TOTAL DWLG I O OUTBLDG LOTS COMM. INDUST. ACRES TOTAL IN INSPECTED; � DWLG . DATE: �p -')• 80.`` 7� OUTBLDG. ACREAGE COMPUTATIONS LOTS LAND TYPE a or AGREE PRICE TOTAL DEPII VALVE Tiil ASSESSMENT COMM. HOUSE LOT . '" / ? ; r.' O So o 09 o•fo e 70 /y.7-f-0 INO —US t. CLEARED FRONT A.- 1550 3.TQ ACRES REM TOTAL PASTURE FRONT _ DWLG REAR _ .2.2C) OUTBLDG.. WOODS i SPROUT FRONT Lors REM COMM. WASTE FRONT of INDUST. REM ACRES LOT COMPUI ATIONS I nose T I DI ►TN STRtR ►RICI folpTH K FRONT R PRICE I TOIAI —� airs. OR.INi yALUE TOWN OF NEW FAIRFIELD, CONN. TOTAL LAND FACTORS DWLG ASSESSMENT HILLY NO CITY SEWER OUTBLDG ROUGH NO CITY WATER LOTS HIGH GRAVEL RD. COMM. LOW DIRT RD. a INDUST. SWAMPY NO RD. ACRES LEVEL PAVED TOTAL UGIT'EO APPRAISAL CO.. LAST HART FORD, CORN. LOT COMPUI ATIONS I nose T I DI ►TN STRtR ►RICI folpTH K FRONT R PRICE I TOIAI —� airs. OR.INi yALUE TOWN OF NEW FAIRFIELD, CONN. TOTAL LAND FACTORS DWLG ASSESSMENT HILLY NO CITY SEWER OUTBLDG ROUGH NO CITY WATER LOTS HIGH GRAVEL RD. COMM. LOW DIRT RD. a INDUST. SWAMPY NO RD. ACRES LEVEL PAVED TOTAL UGIT'EO APPRAISAL CO.. LAST HART FORD, CORN. ��1 + v�iCY�L� ����L � ��f°. �:.+�"��I.1, `�h•�y tit,���a l>L,LBisli �:'4: _3 #`lr.s'[`.t:.��Li:+it +',;•\ ![��t1i:CeL1 R 1 L E Y• CORBO 1 • s thomds rilry•drehitect rick o. corbo. j18z grdssy plain St. j' ! Bethel, ct. o6801 203.791' 07481 • . 1, • 3 Aug 1990 + Attorney Anthony Checas • I j Thomas J: Ryan Attorney'at Law: suite 210 ! ' j • !• .� 57 Nortb Street j :Danbury, Connecticut 06810 Dear Tony: I am sending You this letter as a follow -up to our convey '}' �satioil' regarding the site visit I made to the Lima property 'located at 10 Hopewell Road, New Fairfield, Connecticut, oh 1. i3 ,Aug, 1,990 :I was a:ccmpanied to..the site. by _Mr., Steave f•.Bjel -ko, Bulldi.ng Official : for: theeTown� of ,;Neel Fairfield'; ' i ",!Connect is j ! my essi 1 After; ok.ing at he building; it .is ,prof o'na op''>i- li ;that, the structure is r.un�ound and::unsaf a cu for �cpan cy, .or re use in a abilitatin retrofit` and reho pLo�,ess,l ' found that :,.the , components -,.o the wood struc•ttire` Saraf:.de'te:: ! ;' ziorated. to the po "int of., unsalvageab.i1: ty Th :f,oun , atibn is in_ an uiiiisable;_ coridit =ion sl:o. This is evidenced by r_lic fact that.numerous cracks hava developed, the walls are otit ! "' , of plumb, ''and the bonding is oiit of level . This ccnditiori '{ ! ;'is. often a symptom of a lack of, or improperly placed, footings under the walls in question. This is the probable ! �l cause for the,foundation to do the .walking" it has exper,,- enced over time. feel :that , the c,lient's. interests and 'welf"are vroul& be .. _. •i�t:i -ng �'buildin.g" k�est� served by', .demolition of t:�e . e�. ., 3n,i t imp over. from sc�ratci I would mention at this 'ghat sinCe!the lot is non-conforming, a variance would be required'! tq; obtain' a zo.ninq approval. Also, some special i; +. i ri (! li. ►j� ? .:gonsideratl'ons; would have to be taken into account for the e m oval of what appears to be asbestos siding. , ��� f!�{ • ;� � �'� ' is ° :-:on. Russell Gerovi j January 22, 19E3 I Page 2 f As this statute hakes clear, the building inspector is required to ia.mediately inspect any house which is hazardous, upon receipt of such information prom "any authentic source." The building inspector is empowered to order any necessary repairs, j and, upon a determination that. removal of the building is: °necessary in the interests of public - safety ", he may order such removal. , Tnus_.the_- .f.irst_step__is._to _have Mr. Bjelko and the Town's fire marshal inmediately inspect the house: _ -Their ink ngs�' — shall -- dictate the -- additional- action,__if any, that rust be- .taken..___- ___ -_ _ to remedy the situation. tote that Section 29 -393 permits -a - - -- " - building inspector to enter onto the"'ptoperty between 9:OO a:m-. and 5:00 p.m. to perform this inspection. By carbon copy of this letter, I am requesting Mr. Bjelko to inform me of the results of his and the fire marshal's inspections. Please call -me if you }ave any questions on this letter. nary; y Yours, SECOR, ChSSIDY P.C. Town/ "torneys - Daniel E. Casagrande DEC : i; ah Enclosure cc: Mr. Steve Bjelko - Gail T. McTaggart, Esq. SECOR, CASSIDY 7, NcF/,R-TLA-ND �Ony N CAS �'Cr, Ja Honorable Russell Gerow -Pi rat Selectman -- Town of New Fairfield P.O. Box 8896 iiew Fairfield, CT 06810 Re: Abandoned House on Roper; ell Drive Dear. Fr. Gerow: Re`.fe'r'ence `is irad' to 'a :�ov:e`nber` 12,,:!'7 :5.7 .1'ett:er: to -me :from then First Selectman Reedy. The letter, a copy of whi s attached, refers to a house on Hopewel'I Dri:'e %':hic : is IM N a.ppar= ently_falljzig dowj. _? q.gq,r:din`g` -t'o �tattrents recei ea from ne gh,no,rs; (pp.pie bf which are also at ,ec he house is' own ed ;,by Daniel hT '111ia m Dugay and ,Vero;n :ca" DUga°y-, 'has'. been ' vacant and unattended for at least 17 -ears, and has become a health and fire hazard. 'advise 'as to tT,e - pr•oce.dure ;for.,.,t :he.. removal, of .this h'o6'. 'frc:i the 'property." Section 29 -393 of the General.Stat'utes sets forth the procedure for removal of structures that are dancerous or in disrepair. The statute provides in pertinent part: On receipt of information from the local fire marshal or from any other authentic source that any building in his jurisdiction, due to lack of exit facilities, fire, deterioration, catastrophe cr other cause, is in such condition as to be a hazard to any person or persons, the building inspector shall immediately make an inspection by himself or by his assistant, and may make orders for additional exit facilities or the repair or alte)ration of the buildin ,4,.. - g rf 'the' sa:��e is � suscepL: -'ble Ito repa'r` or - both or for 'th,e t re7-,.n 'I •their'eof :ifi ar.V 'Such order. -is neceesa�v "in`' �! E �:,� res s�of l?ubi is safety. (Emphasis added.) i P. C. DANOURY OFFICE A.Orc•.aTLAr.t ATTCRLEYS PT Lf',: wtLIVEwTATTOwNCv3 r.I.C'1N15 btco. R.. ✓_•. ,-, / N.;C­CFa V.00_TER PLA.Z- -. ..QTINA R.00R,JR. ,+•q•.q A AADCR 301 MAIN ST FEET• RICMARDO AR�CN�i ­C­5 a AJSN G•'L C _CTA3GART r AF.'5 ;RY. CONNECTICUT C6EtO.5656 TK7VA� G PAR13OT (203) 743.91415 WATERSURY OFFICE CA11C, C. CASAGRANDC I I RLCCRICK 1. MVROLO 41 CNUR ;N ETRCCT PCST O►r.c L BOX 2O1b O•CCvw6[t \ wAtCRbuaY, CONwCCTICU7 067L3• =6:8 stcon. JR. J, wwRa[r, Uo50N (203)757•OZOI C...-Lb C. NART 3• >• wLTO. ♦ SC— OUP" CHESHIRE OFFICC 3E5 SOUTH MAIN STRC[T •.a.lrao •.►o •. r•a►•c. osan• CN[SN:RC. CONra[CTrCUT 00 +10.3n3 e.a •.c u.,•o••.• January 22, - 1988 1.♦r.'•an••.o,••r.•,•• ( 203) 272•5001 Honorable Russell Gerow -Pi rat Selectman -- Town of New Fairfield P.O. Box 8896 iiew Fairfield, CT 06810 Re: Abandoned House on Roper; ell Drive Dear. Fr. Gerow: Re`.fe'r'ence `is irad' to 'a :�ov:e`nber` 12,,:!'7 :5.7 .1'ett:er: to -me :from then First Selectman Reedy. The letter, a copy of whi s attached, refers to a house on Hopewel'I Dri:'e %':hic : is IM N a.ppar= ently_falljzig dowj. _? q.gq,r:din`g` -t'o �tattrents recei ea from ne gh,no,rs; (pp.pie bf which are also at ,ec he house is' own ed ;,by Daniel hT '111ia m Dugay and ,Vero;n :ca" DUga°y-, 'has'. been ' vacant and unattended for at least 17 -ears, and has become a health and fire hazard. 'advise 'as to tT,e - pr•oce.dure ;for.,.,t :he.. removal, of .this h'o6'. 'frc:i the 'property." Section 29 -393 of the General.Stat'utes sets forth the procedure for removal of structures that are dancerous or in disrepair. The statute provides in pertinent part: On receipt of information from the local fire marshal or from any other authentic source that any building in his jurisdiction, due to lack of exit facilities, fire, deterioration, catastrophe cr other cause, is in such condition as to be a hazard to any person or persons, the building inspector shall immediately make an inspection by himself or by his assistant, and may make orders for additional exit facilities or the repair or alte)ration of the buildin ,4,.. - g rf 'the' sa:��e is � suscepL: -'ble Ito repa'r` or - both or for 'th,e t re7-,.n 'I •their'eof :ifi ar.V 'Such order. -is neceesa�v "in`' �! E �:,� res s�of l?ubi is safety. (Emphasis added.) i Page 2 Pullman, Comley, Bradley & Reeves ATTORNEYS AT LAW The zoning ordinance allows ordinary repair . and maintenance, and allows replacement of an existing use which is suddenly destroyed by an event outside the property owner "s reasonable control. ThisIot._ did_ not::- contain : a nonconforming use _ -_.in lawful - existence- .,. -:on the ;effective date of the zoning y.,, Section 2 4 2 : Mr Lima has no bas ' ordinance as pr.oyided_ , b is to claim -a :variance. o,f,. either...set backs" or..'min mum .lot-size. Sincerely, IM _J � Michael N. LaVelle. MNL /pm cc: Cheryl Reedy, First Selectman el__� _._..-- . -._... - - .____._.._...... Pullman, C ; le ; -Bradley k1 eeves. A T T � i T� " �A E. . rOw L OI OUW a Ksort WOO" _ ! rVT(.T / MUM OJIAOL711 l .1iAI L—OW /. PAWO11 r.Yrr /. W-M A LII.16 w Oai aND &A" OND L $ftW I Olre/Tb O Omoreea A Y.Ne L food"A ' +� , L.LtA71 OIAACQ GUL.tll r11C C11 AM= it Vrop"m OO %AMY OIIO/ Loft" OOOMw l *%LNG a 111101 CM L A/'/Ot0/ - � AMM .10 CIr1rV wua L urn O..D a PACKWO [Moil L "km ; j 1 tamm NLOUM OMILT .eeLaT M Iroo.. row /. rwanmr ra J w OOIIOLM a OMIT/CT f./ar CJIAAM G m mra=A r a" a110Vr a {TlOQA10 aC7<aI rl Oe1a�DEI 00M G '• O L O11LT7sI[La OVAa E OOUOIAO A 9"WAS LDO./D V. 00=00r. 0 ILLI161 A a IIH NC[ ftWC r..e. a 91WS r 1aNI G LO{VNl► rower v r.toOWUM . lflnl t OLDCFA"W 0;;a IASItl I ; L Ca1O1V PWIW a P.CLIAW lOpiLlV aT014 KVAV" Bridgeport 330 -2112 RMY M. TEL I November 13, 1990 Mr. Don Kamps, Chairman Zoning Board of Appeals Town of New Fairfield P.O. Box 8896 New Fairfield, CT 06812 Re: Appeal No. Application 10 Hopewell Dear Don: 62 -90 of Salvatore Lima, Drive . L401V1 .LR1LL Um /'TAU M .VKOOIWa w«a a 004CTM WTn.al Waafto.ca . CJ MVW r 4L1/00 .vb= T. OfMM J" a r.1O0 GA IM 0 wno= Room Y 001MOM�rq Lima'.`has applied for set ac, and mnimual lot size. variances . in. -order; ;to build a house on an undersized "'iot." "His lot is approximately 0.226 acres in an R -44, one -acre zone. The development of a nonconforming lot is controlled by Section 2.3 of the new zoning ordinance. rMr Lima: should apply }fo'r a. zoning permit in: accordance with .Section. -2 .3:.'rather .than for" =a variance.':` The minutes of the Public Hearing of October 25, 1990 indicate that Mr. Lima's attorney called the attention of the Board to Section 2.4.4 of the zoning ordinance. Tha't.`secton. permits an existing building : or, `structure which is legally nonconforming ..to be rebuilt if;: it !'i`s`damagedl "dr 'destroyed ` by fire, .expho`sion, ,, Yanda'lism, act .._of •God .. or the publ`id-- 'enemy:" The property contained an abandoned and uninhabitable building whiph., was 7destroyed.. by demolition. Section 2.4.3(b) permits t�:::..�_ :_.. t maintenance and repair work to keep, a' °structure in- sound condition; "'which would:,' not.. ricl'ide °''d'emolton and replacement. Bridgeport Center. 850 Main Strcct. P.O. Box 7006. Bndgcport. Ci 06601.7006 TL•l. (203) 330.2000 Fa% (203) 576.8$38 nn n.... C1(, . ... �_ ._ ,-r n.._1w.ncin T. .1 rI(I ii Ir, .t_r(100 R,x 1203) 251•'070 Although there was an illusion of a house on the property, the record shows that it had been abandoned, condemned and torn' down. ;Mr:. La;Velha, CNew' el:r3 town attorney) ;. :, : M . advised the Zoning ;Board of Appeals that this property is not ... eligible,_as a .rebuild: As to the question of hardship, it would seem that Mr. Lima, has created his own hardships. Mr. Simpkins is treating and has treated this case as a hot potato. The criteria established by the Board of Health is for the safety of the public. I believe that to approve this well in N.Y. by a variance of the established restrictions would be wrong. Please advise me of your decision. Very truly yours, Frank Banca ....,_ .......e......._. _ _.. :.:. i Mr. John Karell, Director Putnam County Health Dept. 110 Old Route 6 Carmel, New York 10512 Mr. Karell : qD Frank La Banca 2 Eldred Rd. New Fairfield, CT. 06812 (203) 746 -4509 t MIT GJ 8/7/91 Mr. Morris, of your office, Mr. Boyd of the Boyd Well - Drilling Company and Mr. Tim Simpkins, New Fairfield Sanitarian, have consulted me about a proposed well on the property adjacent to mine on Hopewell Drive in Putnam Lake. Mr. Sal Lima is now the owner of record and while the majority of the parcel is in Connecticut, a tiny portion is in New York. The. proposed well is to be installed on the. port Lon. of..the. property- that" is in New_ York, within '50 feet of` my sept> c .system and within 5 feet of my sideline and 5 feet of the road. In Mr. Boyd's words : he wishes to "sneak it on" and will attempt to make a deal with N.Y. and CT. authorities. This proposed well is not about water. There is another well on the property and the State of Connecticut refused to allow the proposed septic to be used with the existing well. . Mr. Lima is not 'a victimized party since he is not the original owner and has- Durchased -the lot'in, the past, year' wlth.ful1 knowledge-'of its drawbacks and weaknesses. The property is listed as 226 of'an acre. It doesn't meet the usual criteria for lot size. As you are probably aware this Ball Fond area has had its share of publicity for septic failures on small parcels. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Division Of Environmental Health Services 110 Old Route Six Center, Carmel, New York 10512 (914) 225 -0310 August 19, 1991 Tim Simpkins New Fairfield County Health Department PO Box 8896 New Fairfield, CT 06812 U JOHN KARELL Jr., P.E., M.S. Public Health Director Re: Well Permit - Lima. Hopewell Road (T) Patterson TM #25.57 -1 -51 Dear Mr. Simpkins: As per our telephone conversation on August 13, 1991 the application for a well permit for the above captioned lot cannot be granted for the following reasons: .1. The proposed well location is approximately 72 feet from the existing SSDS on LaBanca's property to the north. New York State Sanitary Code requires a 100.foot separation distance. 2. The existing well on Lima's property is approximately 100 feet from the existing SSDS on LaBanca's property. The" relocation 'of the well will decrease the separation distance to 72 feet. It appears that if the proposed well is located in Connecticut to the extreme north west of the property Connecticut's required separation distance of 75 feetr between well and SSDS can be met by relocating the proposed SSDS 6 -feet to the south. This would also eliminate any conflict with New York State Sanitary Code requirements and allow all facilities to be located in the State of Connecticut under one approval authority.. If you have any questions, please contact me at your convenience. RM /JP Very truly yours, ,U v Robert Morris Assistant Public Health Engineer �! r r MET _ ..._......__._..._..,,III► 1,.'�,;;V:a: . ''' 3. 'y .. �,I. ,. , I. �\ T �� to' 1 •, �••I 1 ,I, .111:•; •' 1 ,0 IIt Aj If sqv gel I fop BOU 19T lip � •. '` �,� ' .. �,.,.•�rr � .. •,, .. I r prat:. Qr,►t 1. fl i !;tic LIQitE '♦ / 1 0 i s f 1 ME y. 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SU. ^,VET' AND THE C J R` SHOWN HEREON A,1 ".E " , , CU'P DS AND M ASUI,EMEN1'1' I ' THE U SUBST�,NTIALV.Cri, ^,:E'C7o" Ti 1, e ,. L:h,.,.. 1 ���r'`��`�� :�.f err'''., 1r THS r LINE Or ACTUAL PCSSESSIrJN A. ",: TH' AAI. 1 TIT LINES -AND. :'':.:' ;, �•'... is l t .A .LOCATED AS SHOWY ` SAM!, TI,,g7 TH. BULDIyG; ARez 1 1 :� • .••• �I� i; -0!t BUILDING LINES;r THAT THGaR NCI EI�,CROr,Ct! .07 UF�:,`I ST :i, TIM', r•',;! •'1' �'r 1:.� '� T V51 • . AR' NO VIC i RE �, • ' �• . f..,. 'r t•' : ',3 . REGULA IOI N RESPECT TO TH. lOC/1TION 0" c TI,, .,,� O,'• Z01ylNG Rl.'LES O.'.' 1:" ;�.f i•::? '.. +1>r' 1 11:w 7 r r ; AR. NO EASEMENTS CI r u... - . ' " ^I� CUII CIPIy AND THAT THF%" ' ' c 1 4�: '' : ► ;' J Z EhCRCr,C11,•,E�Jr,� AFFcCTiNG THIS PROPERTY APP�,R,3i'4,•'�'I'1 {� r' r r,s4 ENT FROM A CAREFUL PHYSICAL INSFECTIG; J 0 1,•t; SAL1F O+I IFR • ! � •' I , �. � . � ,�. I SHONN OR DEPICTED H;REO iN •.• • �' •' APR11w 201, 1072 Zu 4", MAP. fir' PU!NArl LAt'E ; ,'� '� j�7I" "x'90 PAI 1 . t 1: !L-LEVEL I _ bottom'of fill slope iERS L6 MAX. X. 20 C. —CHECK VALVE IF REQUIRED FOR PUMPING STA1l 'OUIL'ET, 75 r /in We &rmv us ` ALARM iii _ OUTLET �/— UTILIZE 2" DIA, FORC MAIN(8ASTM D2241, top of fill sope t FLOAT C -900, OR ASTM 1 ,) 316'BEL'OW FINISHED GRADE OR PITCH BA 6FROM DISTRIBUTION BOX ON -OFF I / TO PUMP STATION `I 1 FLOAT , I AFFLE BY TANK MANUFACTURER F'j F` _ pole i. stake B .5 AFFL I� "- /3" lye 694 III61 *T� GAS DEFLECTOR SIT d - = == (PUMP )- SUBMERSIBLE SEWAGE t E 11 = PUMP GOUL DS MODELI'' "' .:•al a: } °.:: 1C 3885 P/N WE0311L Gb. 1 /3HP 10 115V 9.4AMFS 6 WIDTH - C IE TANK AS MANUFACTURED NOTE: A CONCRETE TANK "'. "APPROVED EO AL AN ACCEPTABLE A RNATE. a 100 adios X LO r e 9310 -9315 % stin 3ALL6NS TY E 1 i ` i 88.3 �5• ex' '• 1 Vic'. fi », approximate location of existing 44 ":�: 300 PU P STATION 53" 122" 49" ( 1g .'well. dwelling to be modified as 000 SE TIC TANK 53" 146•' 50•' r per Health Department Requirements ` vl ;:;1•• % t 985 29 j iELENE EPTIC PUMPING . 't z ( i:. K DETA q J �'� _ •� d N.T.S. !7 O k 90.17 1p 0 -6 o to - OOVk7t COMP tTE SEP 'IC SYSTEM al D s Al I. 1 , c o• ....... 8863 Invin ,'�_"t =r:1 ';.,;:�.:' •'m•. LEACHING AREA W/ Y OF WPSOIL I(3 /�.;r S `C pro' k..,_ : 1 �., :•; AND`SEED WITH HAY` j S ° t i'��/Y• �,A a q'E. °'.aI �.`Lr °aar °d BACKFILL TR�,� 41/._r �'. C /p° ..� 1 /} }l�a �k_ �Fa OQ oe a'IPv /o-Hoc ��Pe... 1 ��; \ :••:• :'�•: COARSE SAND MATERIAL Y- ,, r e 3 2" dlo force A r .1. s:.y:� - 9 NON- WOVEN ' • C - 'W8 O. c° 1 Pe =dr_ Ft'�tJ : •main ( refer FILTER FABRIC WWWW 'I "z �pryQ '000 , to Spec. AS r..' ( ew c //c n/ VAC 1 vrn rQd •t --� 1 , de /og y1900 �bN /o /// of /on�7 a / /�e IiP t MI 1 ::•DTaS.- t � ,tt r •f, aj_ , EXISTING S01 OR SA ' / '� /• �✓ s 1 1 #- I 1 ••:93.51 f (REFER _ - •. .4i ,� 87.84 1 89.90 5" O 1 TO 1%4" TRAP RO K �- tdt WASHED GRAVEL ( i 1 J (BOTH SIDES) N15'19'p� 60.46' / -- R=188.63 PEA GRAVEL X 6' WIDE "1 "_ - b, _ Ov Y+I" ✓���fA� :1;6N�� /'� ��6' /�L VI ` (TREItCM WIDTH) DE PTiJ -1-_ Abp q.� �,.-' P' s.�j,• �- •..r IZ ' MAY BE REDUCED TO 2 —a-- y , A/ WHEII (:AI1 FRV IC '4!1" A \1 A 6A" ' ®a3 97.28 e pert —limit of select fill DTa5 96,27 DB -5 w /baffl, ( refer to of fit